Quantcast
Channel:
Viewing all 5681 articles
Browse latest View live

Blog Post: LACT Unit Base Volume versus Base Prover Volume

$
0
0

Update: I should have also mentioned that Rossella will be conducting an October 15 webinar, Optimizing Wellpad Custody Transfer of Liquid Hydrocarbons. If you’re in the onshore oil & gas industry, you’ll want to register and bring your custody transfer questions.

The custody transfer process exchanging oil & gas production between business entities is a critical part of the overall production process. I received this question to an earlier post, How to Prove Your LACT Meter:

I was wondering if you could explain the difference between Base Volume and Base Prover Volume when proving meters.

In that post, Emerson’s Rossella Mimmi shared how provers were used to compare a known volume against the Lease Automatic Custody Transfer (LACT) unit’s flow meter output, where the ratio between the prover reference volume and the meter reading is the meter factor, which is used to correct the meter reading.

I shared this question with Rossella and asked her if she could help me explain the difference. She explained:

Rossella Mimmi  Pipeline Oil & Gas Industry Manager Flow Solutions Group

Rossella Mimmi
Pipeline Oil & Gas Industry Manager
Flow Solutions Group

I think the question refers to how the meter factor is calculated, dividing the prover reference volume by the base volume. Basically two quantities are compared, one is the volume actually measured by the flow meter, the other one is a reference known volume that is the prover’s one.

This is a prover’s operating principle:

Daniel-48in-Pipe-ProverThe prover consists of a length of pipe whose internal volume has been very accurately determined; the displacer is forced to travel at the same velocity as the liquid in the pipe. During meter calibration the meter and the prover are connected in series so that the volume swept out by the piston or sphere can be compared with the volume registered by the meter whilst liquid is flowing steadily from one to the other. As the displacer enters the calibrated pipe section it trips a detector, thereby initiating a count of pulses from the meter under calibration.

A second detector is tripped when the displacer reaches the end of the calibrated pipe section, thus stopping the meter pulse count. This volume is compared to the volume indicated by the meter, to determine a meter factor. This operation is carried out without interrupting the flow of liquid through the meter. Automatic valves, external or internal to the prover, control or divert the flow to cause travel of the displacer during the proving run. Proving should be performed under the same conditions as it is normally expected to operate. The meter prover must have a capacity large enough to provide proving runs of adequate duration.

The question and answer were too good to leave buried in an email exchange, so I wanted to share it with you.

You can connect and interact with other flow and oil & gas professionals in the Flow and Oil & Gas tracks of the Emerson Exchange 365 community.

Related Posts:


Blog Post: LACT Unit Base Volume versus Base Prover Volume

$
0
0

Update: I should have also mentioned that Rossella will be conducting an October 15 webinar, Optimizing Wellpad Custody Transfer of Liquid Hydrocarbons. If you’re in the onshore oil & gas industry, you’ll want to register and bring your custody transfer questions.

The custody transfer process exchanging oil & gas production between business entities is a critical part of the overall production process. I received this question to an earlier post, How to Prove Your LACT Meter:

I was wondering if you could explain the difference between Base Volume and Base Prover Volume when proving meters.

In that post, Emerson’s Rossella Mimmi shared how provers were used to compare a known volume against the Lease Automatic Custody Transfer (LACT) unit’s flow meter output, where the ratio between the prover reference volume and the meter reading is the meter factor, which is used to correct the meter reading.

I shared this question with Rossella and asked her if she could help me explain the difference. She explained:

Rossella Mimmi  Pipeline Oil & Gas Industry Manager Flow Solutions Group

Rossella Mimmi
Pipeline Oil & Gas Industry Manager
Flow Solutions Group

I think the question refers to how the meter factor is calculated, dividing the prover reference volume by the base volume. Basically two quantities are compared, one is the volume actually measured by the flow meter, the other one is a reference known volume that is the prover’s one.

This is a prover’s operating principle:

Daniel-48in-Pipe-ProverThe prover consists of a length of pipe whose internal volume has been very accurately determined; the displacer is forced to travel at the same velocity as the liquid in the pipe. During meter calibration the meter and the prover are connected in series so that the volume swept out by the piston or sphere can be compared with the volume registered by the meter whilst liquid is flowing steadily from one to the other. As the displacer enters the calibrated pipe section it trips a detector, thereby initiating a count of pulses from the meter under calibration.

A second detector is tripped when the displacer reaches the end of the calibrated pipe section, thus stopping the meter pulse count. This volume is compared to the volume indicated by the meter, to determine a meter factor. This operation is carried out without interrupting the flow of liquid through the meter. Automatic valves, external or internal to the prover, control or divert the flow to cause travel of the displacer during the proving run. Proving should be performed under the same conditions as it is normally expected to operate. The meter prover must have a capacity large enough to provide proving runs of adequate duration.

The question and answer were too good to leave buried in an email exchange, so I wanted to share it with you.

You can connect and interact with other flow and oil & gas professionals in the Flow and Oil & Gas tracks of the Emerson Exchange 365 community.

Related Posts:

Forum Post: RE: DeltaV Xi Reporter issue

$
0
0

I would first check that both the Xi Server and the Discovery Server services have started. They both depend on the DeltaV service as well. Not a common issue but you also need to make sure the Xi Server is re-installed after any upgrades. You also didn't mention where you are running the services. By default it would be the ProPlus.

Blog Post: 에머슨의 무선 레벨 기술 - 제 2부

$
0
0
에머슨의 무선 레벨 기술 - 제 1부 보기​​ ​ ​에머슨의 무선 레벨 기술 - 제 2부 레벨 애플리케이션 레벨 제품이 광범위한 측정 및 제어를 위해 유정에서 널리 사용되면서, 시설과 작업자의 안전을 보장하고 공정 효율성에 기여하고 있습니다. 신규 설비의 경우에는 레벨 계기를 신속하고 손쉽게 배치할 수 있는지 여부가, 최초 오일 생산의 속도에 지대한 영향을 미치는 중요한 사안으로 작용합니다. 기존 설비의 경우, 구형 기술을 최신 레벨 측정 장치로 교체하는 것은 유지 보수를 감소시키며 정확한 측정을 가능하게 합니다. 어느 쪽이든, 케이블 작업이 필요하지 않은 무선 기술이 유정에 가시성을 추.......

Forum Post: RE: PCSD HCD

$
0
0

Thanks for the information, Amod.

Don't get me wrong. I like the concept of PCSD, but the execution seems a bit messy sometimes looking from the outside. It works fine as it is, as long as you don't try to modify anything yourself.

HCD and the 'old' PCSD. For instance, I've had (many) operators complaining about the number of tabs on the PCSD detail pictures and the function of each one. With some extra training they now know which are important for operations and which are not. Same for some dynamos.

I haven't seen the PCSD HCD hands-on yet, so I'm very interested to see how they improved the HMI.

Forum Post: RE: STRING DATA TYPE IN DELTAV

$
0
0

As far as I can tell, a STRING type parameter can hold up to 124 characters. String parameters written from expressions are limited to 256 chars.

Like Youssef explains this is further limited to 200 because of the maximum serial dataset size. 200 chars can be quite a long operator request.

If possible, you could consider using an enumeration or named set instead and only send the integer over serial bus. Then on the receiving end, show the according string. In DeltaV named sets however, strings are limited even to 48 chars. So might not be usable in your case.

Forum Post: RE: DV11.3.1 - Operate - How to get the alarm name ?

$
0
0

In addition, I have found this way to automaticaly enlarge ALL "Alarm summary" objects on my picture :

Private Sub CFixPicture_Initialize()
On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
   frszinitPicture Me
   ' Added to enlarge DV Alm Summary fields
   Dim oOo As Object
   For Each oOo In Me.ContainedObjects
       If oOo.Description = "DO NOT CHANGE THIS FIELD : DV Alarm Summary Control" Then
           oOo.AutoFitColumns
       End If
   Next
   Exit Sub
ErrorHandler:
   frsHandleError
End Sub

Forum Post: RE: Aborting Phase through Logic

$
0
0

Agreed with Youssef. Be careful using BCMD. Use XCMD whenever possible. It's called eXternal for a reason. BCOMMAND is a parameter customized to be used by the batch system, XCMD on steroids.

I did a quick test running a phase with manual phase control and aborting by writiing 10 to BCMD and it does work fine. Batch server didn't mind the remote command and keeps track of the phase state.


Forum Post: RE: 3rd Party OPC Server, connecting from Application Station via OPC Mirror

$
0
0

Adrian, is the CIMUSER account on the DeltaV app station a local or domain account?  I would actually try setting up BOTH a local and domain CIMUSER on the DV App station with matching passwords. Use OPCWatchit to test whether local\CIMUSER and domain\CIMUSER on DV App station gets the callbacks.

Thats the first leg of the journey.

Next, through OPCWatchit, see if local\CIMUSER and domain\CIMUSER can write to DeltaV OPC server tags. If you hav set up CIMUSER in DeltaV Usermanager as a domain account, only domain\CIMUSER will suceed.  IF you set up CIMUSER as a local account in User Manager (no domain or app station as domain) then only local\CIMUSER will succeed.  I have had more luck with the former, but bottom line was both the local and domain accounts needed to exist.

Thats the second leg of the journey.

Next, I would set up OPC Mirror to run as domain\CIMUSER.   You can also try local\CIMUSER.  

Blog Post: Educational Resource for Tuning and Control Loop Performance

$
0
0

Process Automation Hall of Fame member, Greg McMillan

Greg McMillan
ISA Fellow

Process automation hall of fame member Greg McMillan has nearly completed an updated version of the book, Tuning and Control Loop Performance: A Practitioner’s Guide. It had last been updated back in 1994. You may be familiar with Greg through his blog posts on the Control Talk and ISA Interchange blogs.

He shared with me that this 4th edition is nearly a 1000 pages long and is a complete rewrite of the 1994 3rd edition. Greg noted that a lot has happened and he has learned a lot in the last 20 years. The book shows how lambda tuning and external reset feedback (e.g. DeltaV Dynamic Reset Limit) can be used to overcome challenges associated with lag-dominance, cascade control, slow valves, interactions, nonlinearities, resonance, and valve position control.

This book will be available this fall and I will update the post when it is available for ordering. If you are interested in knowing when it will be available follow Greg in Twitter and/or connect with him in LinkedIn and he’ll share the news with you.

Here is the current draft of the preface from the book to better understand the scope of the changes:

Most plants depend entirely upon PID control. Even plants with model predictive control still depend on the PID to deal with valve nonlinearities and provide fast control of flows and pressures. Yet most of the capability of the PID is not effectively used due to disagreements as to PID tuning rules and a lack of guidance on how to meet different objectives and deal with process and automation system dynamics. This book seeks to provide an intensive and extensive view of what is needed to get the most out of the PID based on 44 years of experience in applying PID control in the process industry. New tools for analyzing and tuning loops offer automatic identification of loop dynamics, PID settings, and statistics on variability. This book seeks to take advantage of the new ability of tools today to know the dynamics and choose tuning rules and factors to free up the individual to focus more on selecting PID options and setting parameters to meet the challenges and objectives of the application.

The 1st edition in 1984 focused on the tuning methods prevalent at the time with the objective of minimizing the peak and integrated error from unmeasured load disturbances at the process input. Tuning techniques to minimize these errors were aggressive. In practice the PID gain was cut in half to provide more robustness (e.g. gain margin increased from 2 to 4). While minimizing these errors is still important for preventing activation of safety instrumentation systems, relief devices, preventing environment violations, and preventing off-spec product in columns, crystallizers, evaporators, and reactors, there are many other considerations. The book has been almost completely rewritten in the 4th edition to meet other objectives such as minimizing overshoot in the setpoint response, minimizing the propagation of oscillations due to interactions and resonance, maximization of variability absorption for surge tank level, and maximizing the coordination of loop responses to reduce transients in the material and energy balances. Also provided is the recognition of when measurement, valve, and variable frequency drive (VFD) dynamics and resolution limits present a problem and the use of PID tuning and options to minimize the consequences until the source of the problem is fixed. Tuning is not meant to be a cover up but a symptom of a system problem. Dynamics and tuning and can be used to find how to improve the equipment, piping, measurement, PID, valve, or VFD design and installation.

The 4th edition is exceptionally long because the topic is so huge and practical expertise that plays such a key role in the success largely remains in the brains of senior specialists, consultants and technologists. The principles, simple algebraic equations, recommendations, examples, test results, and key points presented seek to make the information more accessible. While some of the foundation is derived from the frequency domain, the details and understanding is based on relationships are detailed in the time domain since this is what is seen on trend recordings and can deal with discontinuities from analyzers and valve backlash and stick-slip. The analysis in the time domain is more consistent with the thought process of practitioners opening up a dialog between process control, operations and process design. This is not to discount the value of frequency domain analysis and power spectrums available in new tools that can build upon what is learned in university courses on control theory.

If I had to pick chapters to read first, I would recommend Chapters 1-3 to provide the basis and overview of the total solution. Subsequent chapters provide more of the details for a spectrum of application considerations, problems and solutions. The appendices provide significant technical support.

Chapter 1 starts out with the basics and provides an overview of tuning rules that are representative of the more than 100 rules documented in the book PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules by O’Dwyer. The 4th edition seeks to show how many of these rules converge to provide the same PID gain and reset time with slightly different factors when the objective is the minimization of errors from load disturbances. The author apologizes if a favorite tuning method is not shown. The important point is that the loop should be tuned and the egos behind particular rules should take a back seat to the solution. A good practitioner will get good results by adjusting factors and using PID features. The 4th edition seeks to document the practical expertise that is more important than the rule. Test results are used in most of the chapters to explore, discover and verify concepts.

Chapter 2 offers a comprehensive overview of the total system solution. A unified methodology is presented to tie together the whole solution. Chapter 3 provides simple equations to estimate the effect of tuning settings on peak and integrated errors for load response and the ability to get to a new setpoint quickly. The relationships between tuning and performance seen in the equations are more important than the actual use of the equations to predict particular values.

The effect of process and mechanical design is analyzed in Chapter 4 and the effect of automation system components are extensively discussed including tables of typical dynamics in Chapters 5-7. The effect of disturbances, nonlinearities and interactions are detailed in Chapters 8-10. The book concludes with a discussion in Chapters 11-15 of how to get the most out of cascade control, advanced regulatory control, process control improvement, auto tuners and adaptive control, and batch optimization.

Greg leads a Mentoring Engineers discussion group in the Emerson Exchange 365 community. Consider joining and participating!

Related Posts:

Forum Post: SPM to RDP.

$
0
0

How can I use the SPM to RDP a third part devices, while storing the credentials in the profile for these devices.

File: Multiple instances of face plates per workstation

$
0
0

Dear All,

We've recently purchased Emerson's quad monitor workstations and are attempting to pull up more than four face plates per workstation. To my understanding the user can only pin four face plates at one time. If a new face plate is opened, the newly opened faceplate will close one of the pinned face plates. We now have a lot of open real estate with the quad monitors and our operators would like to take advantage of this. 

Has anybody worked on or developed such requirements?

If so, please kindly inform and share the details. I have searched the forum as best I could. Please forgive me if this question has already been addressed.

Thank you very much for your help and support.

Blog Post: 생명 과학 분야에서의 무선 어플리케이션

$
0
0
생명 과학 분야에서의 무선 어플리케이션 Gary Mitchell생명 과학 부문 수석 산업 컨설턴트 최근, 생명 과학 분야를 비롯한 공정 제조 업체에서는 시설 내 무선 기술을 이미 수용하고 있거나, 향후 사용을 고려하는 추세가 증가하고 있습니다. 무선 기술은 모바일 작업을 가능하게 만드는 무선 네트워크에서, 장비 모니터링(자산 신뢰성), 무선 계기(트랜스미터, 밸브 등)까지 광범위하게 나뉩니다. pH, ORP, 전도도 용도 Rosemount Analytical 6081 무선 트랜스미터 무선 계기의 사용 증가는 신뢰성과 전지 수명의 향상을 비롯하여, 레이다(레벨), 전도도, pH 트랜스미터를 포함해 새로운 무선 계기 모델의 가용성 및 수용.......

Forum Post: RE: Jumper Settings profibus Card

$
0
0

Thankyou for the information i knew i had seen it somewhere was just looking in the wrong places.

Forum Post: RE: DeltaV MD Series 2 Controller (V6.3) Losing Configuration Intermittently.

$
0
0

Have you tried to open a telnet link to the controller and look in the hardware event logs?


Blog Post: How Differential Pressure Flow Works

$
0
0

One of the most proven ways to measure flow rate is through differential pressure measurement. By creating an obstruction in the flow of fluid, a difference in pressure is created upstream and downstream of the obstruction. In this 3:12 educational YouTube video, How Differential Pressure Flow Works, Emerson’s Rosemount Measurement team illustrates how differential pressure (DP) flow technology works and how an integrated design improves installation and ongoing maintenance.

The video opens describing the two key components in measuring flow rate using differential pressure—the primary element and the secondary element. The primary element, placed in the pipe, is what creates the obstruction in the line to produce the difference in pressure across it. The secondary element or transmitter takes the measurements from the primary element, converts the measurement into useful quantitative values, and transmits the value to the control system.

Primary elements come in many varieties including traditional orifice plates, cone, venture, nozzle, and wedge designs.

DP-Primary-Element

Two additional methods we highlighted in earlier blog posts include the Rosemount Annubar averaging pitot tube and the Rosemount conditioning orifice plate.

Annubar-Conditioning-Orific

From an installation standpoint, integrating the primary and secondary elements removes the need for impulse piping and the maintenance associated with it. This piping is also a potential source for leaks which might pose safety and environmental issues depending on the fluid being measured. The video explains how the primary and secondary elements are integrated.

For advanced multivariable transmitters, compensated mass flow calculations can be performed through the measurement of static and differential pressure as well as process temperature.

More educational videos can be found on the Rosemount Measurement YouTube channel. You can also connect and interact with flow measurement experts in the Flow track of the Emerson Exchange 365 community.

Related Posts:

Forum Post: RE: Voter Function in DCS

$
0
0

Matt,

I tried something similar to what you have suggested. It works,

Thanks for the support.

Manik

Forum Post: RE: Multiple Process History Views

$
0
0

Your suggestion about embedding the PHV's seems like it might be a viable option for us, however we would really like to be able to keep the "events" section of the PHV e-charts.

We already have several trend pages made. Do you know of any way to embed the ".phve" file itself?

Forum Post: RE: Use of PV parameterin AO block

$
0
0

I discovered the joys of the PCSD dynamos/faceplates and the interpretation of the AO block indications earlier this year. It's not easy to get a consistent interface for operators with the various CSD, CSR and AO module types.

All I know is that AO/OUT value represents the mA value to the field 100%= 20mA always.

When inc to close is enabled, AO/CAS_IN is the invert of AO/OUT.

Intuitively I would always want the %output value shown to the operator to represent the % of maximum of the control signal, whether that be %open for a control valve, %max speed for a VSD, %max heat demand for a heater etc...

I believe PCSD gives this if you have an IO_READBACK signal configured assuming the feedback 100% value represents %maximum control. Unfortunately if you don't have a configured feedback signal it reflects the output signal which in the case of an increase to close valve represents the %minimum (closed) value, which for me isn't intuitively correct.

For additional confusion the PCSD loop faceplates dynamically alters the source parameter used for the output indication based on the SUB_FPDT parameter of the module instance, which has different values for the various controller module types.

I'd suggest that the PCSD faceplates and dynamos in their admirable attempt to be all things to all men have become over complex and confused in their implementation and application.

Blog Post: 여전히 석탄을 간과할 수 없는 이유

$
0
0
신재생에너지에 대한 관심은 끊임없이 증가하고 있는 반면에, 우리가 사용하고 있는 에너지의 대다수는 여전히 석탄을 이용하여 만들어지고 있습니다. The Extramile with Charlie에서 소개한 본 글에서는 전 세계 에너지원을 비교한 인포그래픽을 보여주고 있는데요. 천연 가스, 원자력, 수력, 풍력, 태양열 등 많은 발전의 양식들이 존재하지만 여전히 석탄이 에너지원으로서 가장 굳건한 위치를 차지할 수 밖에 없는 이유를 설명하고 있습니다. 이전에 소개해 드렸던 세계 에너지 변화 흐름이라는 포스팅에서 전해드렸던 것처럼, 현재 화석 연료가 차지하는 세계 에너지 소비는 92.2%에 달하는데요. 무조건적인 장점이나 단점만을 가진 에.......
Viewing all 5681 articles
Browse latest View live